Rose Hazell-Evans: my experience as the first radiographer to undertake a radiology PhD at Cambridge
Two years on from becoming the UK’s second ever consultant radiographer in nuclear medicine, Rose Hazell-Evans returns to Synergy to discuss the specialty and how her role has change
Rose Hazell-Evans: my experience as the first radiographer to undertake a radiology PhD at Cambridge
Two years on from becoming the UK’s second ever consultant radiographer in nuclear medicine, Rose Hazell-Evans returns to Synergy to discuss the specialty and how her role has change
Rose Hazell-Evans has already broken new ground in her career, having become only the second consultant radiographer in nuclear medicine in the UK. Now, Rose is preparing to take a huge new step, as she becomes the first radiographer to undertake a PhD within the department of radiology at the University of Cambridge.
With support from the College of Radiographers’ Doctoral Fellowship grant, part of the college’s Industry Partnership Scheme, Rose is using her experience as both a frontline practitioner at West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust and now a researcher at Cambridge to research the most effective ways to diagnose kidney cancer in patients.
“Receiving the College of Radiographers Doctoral Fellowship is an incredible honour and a real privilege,” says Rose. “As a consultant radiographer, I'm passionate about improving patient care through research, and this fellowship gives me the opportunity to pursue that ambition while continuing to work clinically. I'm excited to explore how advanced molecular imaging can improve the diagnosis and management of kidney cancer, and I hope the findings will contribute to more personalised care for patients in the future."
Following on from her previous interview, where she explained how a tumble as a teenager shaped her future career path, Synergy asked Rose about her evolving consultant role, the importance of research in radiography and the nuances of nuclear medicine.
The project
Rose’s project, Total Body PET for Renal Cell Carcinoma characterisation, is a feasibility study that will investigate the use of total body PET (positron emission tomography) to study and identify the severity of kidney tumours without invasive surgery.
At present, it can be hard to tell how aggressive a kidney tumour is without surgery, which results in some patients going under unnecessary treatment. But using PET imaging – a nuclear medicine scan that injects a safe, short-lived radioactive tracer into the body to capture 3D images of the entire human body – could ensure patients are supported to receive the most appropriate care. Rose’s project will investigate whether combining multiple PET tracers with quantitative image analysis can provide additional information about tumour biology and behaviour.
What prompted you to get involved in research?
I think it came quite naturally from clinical practice. I’ve always been curious about why we do things in a particular way and whether there might be a better way of doing them. Working in nuclear medicine, particularly as my role developed into reporting and advanced/consultant practice, I became more interested in the evidence behind what we see on imaging and how we can extract more useful information from it.
Research offered a way to explore some of the questions that arise in everyday clinical practice. My particular interest in renal cancer came from seeing the limitations of conventional imaging in confidently characterising some renal masses, and wondering whether molecular imaging could give us additional biological information that CT or MRI alone cannot.
How is the CoR Doctoral Fellowship supporting your research?
I applied because I wanted to take my research further and develop it into a PhD. The Doctoral Fellowship gives me the support to develop that into a much more substantial programme of research.
The funding is supporting my PhD tuition fees and contributing towards total body PET/CT scanning costs. That means I can investigate whether different PET tracers, quantitative imaging and radiomic features can tell us more about the biology and aggressiveness of renal tumours. The aim is to explore whether imaging could help us characterise these tumours more accurately before treatment.
For me personally, it also provides protected support to develop, which is incredibly important because combining clinical practice with meaningful research can be difficult without dedicated funding.
Can you tell us more about your research?
My research is looking at whether total-body PET imaging can help us understand more about kidney tumours before a patient undergoes treatment. CT and MRI are very good at showing us what a tumour looks like, including its size and location, but they cannot always tell us what type of tumour it is or how it is likely to behave. This can make it difficult to know whether someone needs treatment straight away or whether their tumour could be safely monitored.
PET imaging uses a small amount of an injected radioactive tracer (dye) to show us what is happening inside the tumour. Different tracers reflect different biological processes, so the aim is to see whether using more than one tracer can give us a better overall picture of the tumour’s behaviour.
For the study, a small group of patients undergoing investigation for a renal tumour will have total-body PET scans alongside their usual clinical care. I will look at how the tracers are taken up by the tumour and compare this with the surrounding kidney tissue. I will also use quantitative image analysis to see whether there are patterns within the PET and CT images that may help distinguish between different tumour types. Where patients go on to have a biopsy or surgery, the imaging findings can then be compared with the final histology.
It is an early feasibility study, so the first step is to see whether the scans and analysis are practical and whether the results show enough promise to take forward into a larger study. In the longer term, I hope this could help clinicians make more informed treatment decisions and reduce unnecessary procedures for patients with less aggressive tumours.
What impact could your research have on the radiography profession?
I hope there are two levels of impact. The first is the research itself: if we can demonstrate that advanced molecular imaging provides useful information about tumour biology, it could contribute to more personalised imaging and treatment pathways for patients with renal cancer.
And I think there is a wider professional impact as well. As the first radiographer to be accepted to study for a radiology PhD at the University of Cambridge, I want it to help demonstrate that radiographers can lead research and develop new imaging techniques and contribute to the evidence base that shapes patient care.
I also hope that, by engaging in clinical research at Cambridge, I can help make this pathway more visible and encourage others to follow as the profession continues to evolve. I hope my work contributes in a small way to showing what a radiography career involving research can look like.
Why did you specialise in nuclear medicine?
I was drawn to nuclear medicine very early in my career because I loved the combination of imaging, physiology and physics. With nuclear medicine, you aren’t just looking at what something looks like anatomically, you're looking at what it is doing.
I also like how varied it is. You can be thinking about tracer kinetics one minute and then supporting a patient through their examination the next. I've always found this particularly interesting.
How does being a nuclear medicine radiographer differ from other kinds of radiography?
One of the biggest differences is that we administer a radiopharmaceutical (a radioactive dye) and then image its distribution within the body, so we’re often imaging physiological or molecular processes rather than anatomy alone.
It means nuclear medicine radiographers/technologists need quite a broad skillset. Alongside patient care and imaging, there’s an understanding of radiopharmaceuticals, radiation protection, image processing and quantification, and increasingly CT through hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT systems. There is also often a lot of judgement involved in adapting an examination to the individual patient and understanding the physiology behind the images you’re producing.
What is your favourite part of nuclear medicine?
Probably that you’re able to visualise physiology in a way that you simply can’t see with many other forms of imaging. I still find it fascinating that you can give a patient a tiny amount of a radiopharmaceutical and then visualise a particular biological process happening within their body. I also like that because of the scan length and sometimes multiple appointments, we are able to build up a rapport with our patients and get to know them.
Two years ago you became the UK’s second ever consultant radiographer in nuclear medicine. How has that experience been?
It has been incredibly rewarding, although also quite daunting at times because there wasn’t really an established blueprint for the role in nuclear medicine.
What I’ve enjoyed most is having the opportunity to bring the different parts of advanced practice together. My role isn’t solely clinical; it encompasses expert clinical practice and reporting, leadership, education, service development and research. I’ve been able to help develop services locally while also becoming involved in the profession nationally.
I also feel a responsibility that comes with being one of the first. I certainly hope many more will follow. I hope that demonstrating what a consultant radiographer can contribute within nuclear medicine makes that pathway more visible and achievable for other radiographers.
How has your consultant radiographer role changed your career?
The consultant role formalised a direction my career was already moving in. I was already involved in service management, reporting, governance and developing nuclear medicine services, but becoming a consultant allowed me to bring those areas together with research, education and wider professional leadership.
The biggest change has probably been the level at which I’m expected to think. It’s not just about delivering today’s clinical service, it’s increasingly about asking what the service should look like in several years’ time, what the evidence says, how we improve it and how we develop the people within it.
What lessons have you learned over the course of your career?
Probably that you don’t have to have your entire career mapped out from the beginning. A lot of the opportunities I’ve had have come from being curious, saying yes to things that interested me and being willing to step slightly outside my comfort zone.
I’ve also learnt how important other people are. I’ve been incredibly fortunate to have colleagues, mentors and supervisors who have supported me at different stages of my career, sometimes before I had the confidence to see those opportunities in myself.
And perhaps most importantly, I’ve learned that you shouldn’t assume something isn’t possible simply because you haven’t seen someone like you do it before. Most of the things I’m proudest of in my career didn’t have an obvious pathway when I started.
More about nuclear medicine
Nuclear medicine technologists undertake safety-critical activities including administration of radioactive medicinal products, administration of intravenous contrast media and other prescription-only medicines, dose calculations and autonomous clinical decision making.
Find out more about nuclear medicine here.
More about the College of Radiographers Industry Partnership Scheme
The College of Radiographers Industry Partnership Scheme (CoRIPS) funds projects related to any aspect of the science and practice of radiography, undertaken by radiographers at all stages of their careers. Find out more about the scheme online here.
Read more

